February 23rd, 2015
Paying Attention: FTC Focuses on Cognitive Function Claims in a Video Game
The Federal Trade Commission has made clear in recent months that it will scrutinize claims from advertisers about products that allegedly improve cognitive function, including video game products. See e.g. Your Baby Can Read, and BrainStrong. That trend continued in January when the FTC settled a case against Focus Education, LLC and its officers over allegedly unsubstantiated claims about the company's ifocus System. According to the FTC, Focus's advertisements for iFocus (which included the computer game, Jungle Rangers) claimed the game contained "scientifically proven memory and attention brain training exercises, designed to improve focus, concentration and memory." The ads also claimed the product gave children - even those with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) - the permanent "ability to focus, complete school work, homework, and to stay on task." Focus also created an infomercial including testimonials from children, parents, and a school psychiatrist claiming that the Jungle Rangers game made kids pay attention to teachers and do better in school.
Under the settlement, the FTC prohibited Focus and its officers from:
- making any further claims about the iFocus System, or any similar product, unless the claims are true, not misleading, and appropriately substantiated;
- making claims about Focus products being able to affect the brain's structure or function, improve cognitive abilities, behavior or academic performance, or treat or lessen the symptoms of cognitive abnormalities or disorders, including ADHD; and/or
- misrepresenting the results of any test, study, or research.
The FTC also announced that Focus would be subject to a five year audit of all of its advertisements containing any representation covered by the proposed consent order.
This case should be a reminder to advertisers and agencies that cognitive products, including games, are on the FTC's radar. Advertisers and agencies should work to ensure that all advertisements for such products contain claims that are truthful and backed by competent and reliable scientific evidence.
If you have any questions about this latest enforcement action, or about other advertising law issues, please contact Greg Boyd at (212) 826 5581 or email@example.com, Hannah Taylor at (212) 705 4849 or firstname.lastname@example.org, or any other member of the Frankfurt Kurnit Advertising Group or Interactive Entertainment Groups.
Are You Ready for New York’s New Anti-Harassment Rules?
Many New York employers are days away from a number of important compliance deadlines relating to the recently enacted New York State anti-sexual harassment laws (a link to our prior alert on these laws is here). We have provided a summary of what covered employers need to do.
October 1 2018
California Supreme Court Holds that Conflict Invalidates Firm’s Engagement Letter But Says Firm Still May be Able to Get Paid
Last week, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Manufacturing Co., Inc., a decision which lawyers and law firms anxiously awaited for months.
September 4 2018
IRS Final Regulations Clarify Charitable Contribution Substantiation Requirements
Tax deductions for charitable contributions require the satisfaction of certain substantiation requirements.
August 28 2018