Sign Up for Alerts
Sign up to receive receive industry-specific emails from our legal team.
Sign Up for Alerts
We provide tailored, industry-specific legal updates to our clients and other friends of the firm.
Areas of Interest
March 31st, 2023
Are DAOs Dead? Judge Ruling In bZx Case Spells Trouble, Legal Experts Say
Blockchain Technology Co-Chair Jeremy S. Goldman is quoted in the article, “Are DAOs Dead? Judge Ruling in bZx Case Spells Trouble, Legal Experts Say” published by Decrypt. The article discusses the recent ruling that suggested individual members of bZx DAO could be found liable in lawsuits against the entity, which would be troublesome for token holders. Jeremy is quoted saying, “I mean, it's not good for DAOs. The decision crystallizes the fact that we don't live in a decentralized world. DAOs challenge [traditional business] structures, and our [legal] system. That's what you're seeing, potentially—an inherent incompatibility of those two ideas.”
Jeremy notes that the ruling was not a shock in the legal community. He says, "This didn't come as a surprise to anyone who understands what a DAO is, or how partnership law works in the United States.” This is especially apparent because bZx cofounder Kyle Kistner publicly stated that the benefit of transforming bZx from a company to a DAO would be protecting the organization from government oversight and securities-related legal actions. Jeremy says, “They traded a securities problem for a partnership problem. The SEC didn't go after them. The CFTC did.” Jeremy adds that bZx's refusal to register as an LLC in an attempt to avoid personal liability in American business while also engaging in profit-based digital commodity transactions, led to a situation where DAO members were exposed to an unnecessary amount of legal liability.
In conclusion, Jeremy says, “So what if there's an entity? So what if there's some element of centralization? Why is that so bad?”
Read the full article here.
Other Quoted
4 Takeaways From 1st Opinion on AI Training and Fair Use
Law 360 quotes Jacqueline Charlesworth on the Third Circuit ruling granting summary judgment to Thomson Reuters, in a case alleging tech startup ROSS Intelligence infringed copyrighted material from Thomson Reuters’ Westlaw platform to create a competing legal research tool. Ms. Charlesworth stated the ruling is significant because many AI companies are asserting transformative use, in interpreting The Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith case. (Behind paywall) View Article
February 13 2025
Thomson Reuters Prevails in Copyright Battle with AI Company
MediaDailyNews quotes Jeremy S. Goldman on the federal court decision that Ross Intelligence infringed Thomson Reuters’ copyright by training its services using Westlaw summaries, known as “headnotes.” Mr. Goldman states the ruling could impact lawsuits by other copyright owners over the use of their material to develop AI. However, he distinguishes some of the high-profile cases such as those against OpenAI in training ChatGPT. He notes OpenAI argues it did not copy material to compete with authors and publishers but to create its language model and technology. View Article
February 12 2025
What a Character
Boston College Law School Magazine quotes Jeffrey A. Greenberg in a profile of Michael Schiffer, founder of S2 Advertising Law, and the former legal director at Twitter. The article titled "What a Character" notes that Mr. Greenberg was on the hiring committee that recruited Mr. Schiffer to join Frankfurt Kurnit’s Advertising group, where he worked for more than 10 years. View Article
February 11 2025