Sign Up for Alerts
Sign up to receive receive industry-specific emails from our legal team.
Sign Up for Alerts
We provide tailored, industry-specific legal updates to our clients and other friends of the firm.
Areas of Interest
June 1st, 2022
Calif. Privacy Agency Unveils Long-Awaited Draft Regulations
Privacy & Data Security Group Chair Daniel M. Goldberg and Privacy & Data Security Associate Maria Nava’s recent blog post on the California Privacy Protection Agency’s (CPPA) proposed regulations to the California Consumer Privacy Act is cited in the article, “Calif. Privacy Agency Unveils Long-Awaited Draft Regulations” published by Law360.
"As expected, the Regs clarify that businesses must recognize Do Not Sell or Share (DNS) opt-out preference signals," Daniel and Maria Nava wrote. "While some privacy professionals have argued that businesses have a choice between posting a DNS link or honoring an opt-out preference signal, the Regs expressly state that interpretation is incorrect."
“However, the new proposal fails to clarify what exactly constitutes a valid opt-out signal, declining to recognize the Global Privacy Control or other technical specifications that have been developed to allow consumers to exercise their opt-out rights across the internet” and "As written, businesses arguably must respond to any signal, which will create compliance hurdles," said Daniel and Maria, adding that the regulations also don't prohibit opt-out signals from being set to "on" by default by a browser, like the new consumer privacy law that was recently enacted in Connecticut does.
Daniel and Maria note, “Under the CPRA regulations, companies that receive an opt-out request also need to notify any downstream third parties to stop selling or sharing the information as well” and "This appears to be a higher burden than currently required under CCPA or the CPRA text, and reemphasizes the need for a signal that can be read by downstream parties."
Lastly, Contracts with third parties "must also expressly require the third-party to check for opt-out signals," they added. If implemented, this and other proposed requirements, including that these agreements "expressly identify" the specific service for which the third party is processing information, would result in contracts with third parties needing to be much more robust, Daniel and Maria said.
Read full article here. (Behind paywall)
Other Quoted
A Federal Judge Ordered OpenAI to Stop Deleting Data
Daniel M. Goldberg is quoted in an Adweek article, which reported that a federal judge has ordered OpenAI to stop deleting output data from ChatGPT. This was part of The New York Times lawsuit, alleging OpenAI engaged in copyright infringement “by using ‘millions’ of articles published by the newspaper to train its AI model, which now directly competes with the Times’ content as a result.” The judge’s order seeks to preserve evidence in the Times’ case. Mr. Goldberg addressed mulitple implications of the order, which requires OpenAI to hold more data than they normally would. "That could make OpenAI more susceptible to security breaches, or shake the trust of consumers who expected their chatbot records to be deleted. There are also potential implications regarding energy use, storage and environmental impact that the judge may not have considered when making the order, Goldberg said." He also noted the order would trigger people's concerns about what it means for working with large tecnology providers.
May 21 2025
Democrat LaMonica McIver Charged: What Punishment Could She Face?
Jeremy Bates is quoted in a Newsweek article on New Jersey U.S. representative LaMonica McIver’s arrest by the Trump administration. She’s accused of allegedly assaulting, resisting, and impeding law enforcement officers in a protest against the arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka. Amidst the chaos, Ms. McIver appears to have elbowed an officer. Mr. Bates told Newsweek,“‘Ethical prosecutors refrain from bringing charges that are not supported by probable cause. Here, the Mayor of Newark was charged with trespassing. Days later, DOJ dropped that charge. These facts do not inspire confidence.’” Mr. Bates also stated, “‘Before charging anyone with a federal crime, a DOJ lawyer should ask, would this prosecution be in the interest of my true client, the American people? Or is it an act of presidential malice?’” View Article
May 20 2025
In Suits and Ties, Lawyers Protest Trump’s Attacks on the Legal System
The New York Times quotes Ronald C. Minkoff in its coverage of the May 1, 2025 National Law Day of Action, in which approximately 1,500 people in Manhattan protested the U.S. president’s threats against judges, lawyers and the rule of law. Legal groups organized attorneys across the country to show their opposition to the Trump administration’s defiance of court orders, targeting of law firms, and wrongful deportations. The lawyers reaffirmed their promise to uphold the rule of law and recited the Pledge of Allegiance. Foley Square protest organizers requested that attorneys dress in suits—as if going to court and carry pocket Constitutions. “‘We want people to see that we treat this issue with utmost respect,’ said Ronald C. Minkoff, a defense lawyer and an organizer. ‘This is like the courtroom to us.’” View Article
May 1 2025
