- Published Articles
- In the Press
- Press Releases
Sign Up for Alerts
Sign up to receive receive industry-specific emails from our legal team.
Sign Up for Alerts
We provide tailored, industry-specific legal updates to our clients and other friends of the firm.
Areas of Interest
December 23rd, 2015
Federal Court Rules that Ban on Offensive Trademarks is Unconstitutional
Here's some big news for anyone who owns -- or is contemplating registration of -- a trademark that may offend certain audiences. The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on December 22nd that a law banning the registration of disparaging trademarks is unconstitutional. The Trademark Office and the courts had relied on that law, found in Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, to refuse registration or affirm cancellation of marks found to contain racial slurs or discriminatory phrases, such as THE SLANTS, WASHINGTON REDSKINS, and STOP THE ISLAMITIZATION OF AMERICA, among others.
In In re Simon Shiao Tam the government argued that a refusal to register a trademark under Section 2(a) does not prevent the applicant from using the trademark, and consequently does not impede free speech. However, the Federal Circuit ruled that the law -- which permits the government to deny the legal benefits of registration if it disapproves of the message conveyed by a trademark -- would penalize and inhibit free speech, in violation of the applicant's federal constitutional rights.
This decision stands at odds with the Eastern District of Virginia's ruling in Pro-Football, Inc. v. Blackhorse, which upheld the constitutionality of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act and affirmed cancellation of six trademark registrations relating to the WASHINGTON REDSKINS football team. That decision currently is on appeal to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. It remains to be seen whether that court will follow the Federal Circuit's decision, and whether the constitutionality of Section 2(a)'s disparagement prohibition ultimately will be heard by the Supreme Court.
If you have questions about these cases, or about any other trademark and brand management matters, please contact Catherine Farrelly at (212) 826 5579 or email@example.com or any other member of the Frankfurt Kurnit Trademark & Brand Management Group.
Other Intellectual Property Law Alerts
What Does Brexit Mean for Your UK Trademark Rights?
On January 31, 2020, the UK will formally withdraw from the European Union, and brand owners who have relied on their EU trademark applications and registrations for protection in the UK will need to make sure that their rights are secured in the UK. Read more.
January 31 2020
Supreme Court Says “Scandalous” Trademarks May be Registered
Here’s some news for brands, creators, and other entities developing nonconforming names or entertainment content. Yesterday, the Supreme Court ruled that FUCT and other profane, “scandalous” or “immoral” words may be registered as trademarks. Read more.
June 26 2019
Supreme Court Requires Registration Prior to Bringing Copyright Suit
Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued two unanimous decisions affecting the rights and remedies available to copyright owners. Read more.
March 5 2019