Sign Up for Alerts
Sign up to receive receive industry-specific emails from our legal team.
Sign Up for Alerts
We provide tailored, industry-specific legal updates to our clients and other friends of the firm.
Areas of Interest
July 20th, 2023
Fla. Bar CTA Program Could Be Win For Solos Across The US
Ethics & Professional Responsibility Partner Tyler Maulsby is quoted in the article, "Fla. Bar CTA Program Could Be Win For Solos Across The US" published by Law360. The article discusses a recent Florida Bar initiative offering all Florida attorneys a free organizing tool to track and make notes on their client transactions and to link the transactions to their bank. The initiative allows for a direct balance of their trust. Tyler is quoted saying, "I can't tell you how many times I've seen a lawyer with a very high volume escrow account operating their entire practice off of a spreadsheet. That can just leave a lot of room for error. And so anything that offers a comprehensive trust account management system with opportunities to incorporate failsafe reconciliations is going to make everyone's life easier."
Despite the many benefits associated with the initiative, Tyler notes that it may put solo practitioner and lawyers inside small firms at a significant disadvantage. He says, "For a solo practitioner, it is your job to be a bookkeeper, or you have to hire one, but still you have to reconcile the account, you have to make sure everything is correct, and you have to spend a lot of time doing that. They don't teach you how to do that in law school. And it's very scary, because the stakes are very high."
According to legal ethics attorneys, a majority of their cases deal with issues that stem from simple bookkeeping errors. Tyler says, "One simple mistake can then compound into multiple mistakes. If there's an error on client number one, it's not caught for several months and then multiple other clients' money passes through the account, that means that error could have resulted in errors on many other clients' accounts. And so now you're dealing with issues with multiple clients."
The program is the first of its kind in the country and Tyler adds that the closest thing he's seen to this program in New York is maybe a free continuing legal education program on how to manage trust accounts. He notes, "You can call the grievance committee, and they can help you through certain cost accounting issues, but a continued resource for your ability to stay organized is very helpful, and I haven't seen anything like this. I would love it if the New York State Bar Association did something like this statewide, but I think the cost would be significant. We have a lot of lawyers, they're a voluntary organization dependent on dues and contributions. And the grievance committee would need to get funding from the courts to do that."
In conclusion, Tyler says, "I think ultimately, any resources that are free or at a very low cost offered to lawyers is a good thing. It's a step in the right direction."
Read the full article here. (Behind paywall)
Other Quoted
Challenges in Opt-Out Design and Children’s Privacy Highlighted by Sling TV’s Settlement With California AG
Cybersecurity Law Report quoted Daniel Goldberg regarding California AG Rob Bonta's $530,000 settlement with Sling TV for CCPA violations related to opt-out processes and children's privacy protections. Goldberg noted this is "the first CCPA settlement involving a connected TV" and indicates that connected TV is now a priority for privacy enforcement. Goldberg predicted future settlements are more likely to reach seven or eight figures as investigations progress. He explained that companies struggle to operationalize opt-outs across different platforms because many rely heavily on consent management platform vendors that often cover only cookie-based activity and don't connect to the backend systems that actually drive targeted advertising.
On children's privacy, Goldberg highlighted the CA AG's aggressive stance, noting that although Sling TV didn't collect age data, the AG concluded they still had knowledge of minors through child-directed channels, notifications from programmers, demographic inferences purchased from data brokers, and ad-targeting segments that included children. He observed this "arguably expands the notion of 'actual knowledge' under the CCPA." Goldberg advises companies to map out data flows and opt-out signals across every environment and audit vendor configurations to ensure the tools actually work. Read the full article on children’s privacy protections here. (Behind a paywall)
December 1 2025
Game companies must be flexible to comply with changing laws
Emma Smizer was recently featured as a panelist at GamesBeat Next 2025 and quoted in a GamesBeat article discussing global regulatory compliance and its impact on the gaming industry. The panel examined how evolving policy frameworks create new opportunities for developers and platforms navigating global markets.
Smizer addressed compliance challenges under emerging laws, specifically citing the Texas App Store Accountability Act. She noted that this kind of legislation changes how developers and platforms interact with users: “App stores have to do this age verification, but so do software and hardware developers. Global compliance is complicated, even just across the states… We’re moving toward a world where you can’t just be willfully ignorant about the age of your users.”
Her analysis emphasizes a growing trend that age verification and child safety requirements are not only regulatory hurdles but also can create opportunities and growth for businesses and sectors. Read the full summary of the panel here.
November 25 2025
Copyright Guide or Policy Change? Project Divides IP Attys
Law360 quoted Jacqueline Charlesworth on the controversy surrounding the American Law Institute’s copyright restatement project. Ms. Charlesworth criticized the initiative as advancing a “revisionist theory” that could weaken copyright protections. She was among nearly two dozen advisers who resigned from the project, signaling deep concerns about its direction.
The article highlights a broader debate within the IP community: whether the restatement simply clarifies existing law or attempts to reshape policy in favor of users. Ms. Charlesworth’s perspective emphasizes the stakes for rights holders as courts and practitioners consider how much influence the restatement may carry. Read the Law360 article about the copyright restatement project here.
November 19 2025
