Sign Up for Alerts
Sign up to receive receive industry-specific emails from our legal team.
Sign Up for Alerts
We provide tailored, industry-specific legal updates to our clients and other friends of the firm.
Areas of Interest
February 10th, 2023
Now That Birkin NFTs Are Illegal, What Happens to the Ones Collectors Bought?
Blockchain Technology Co-Chair Jeremy S. Goldman is quoted in the article, “Now That Birkin NFTs Are Illegal, What Happens to the Ones Collectors Bought?” published by Observer. The article discusses the landmark case between Hermès and MetaBirkin creator, Mason Rothschild and the challenges associated with destroying the NFT collection. Jeremy is quoted saying, “Taking the MetaBirkins off the market will be nearly impossible. It’s a real unanswered question with blockchain: what happens in the event of infringement?”
Jeremy notes that in typical infringement cases regarding physical goods, a positive ruling would allow a company to impound and destroy the assets. He says, “It’s very difficult to get rid of the tokens or de-link the artwork.” While Hermès can prevent major NFT marketplaces from selling the MetaBirkins, there is not much they can do to prevent the collection’s sale outside of that. Jeremy adds, “It’s not so different than what happens in the real world If a manufacturer creates counterfeit goods, there’s not much control once they’ve left. It’s very hard to put that genie back in the bottle.”
Jeremy also notes that the value of MetaBirkins may see a bump in demand because of their new status as contraband. He identifies customer recourse as another issue made complicated by the digital nature of the case. He says, “Owners of physical assets typically have recourse against those who sell them counterfeit goods, such as fake luxury bags. It’s still unclear whether MetaBirkin holders can extract compensation from Rothschild.”
Read the full article here.
Other Quoted
4 Takeaways From 1st Opinion on AI Training and Fair Use
Law 360 quotes Jacqueline Charlesworth on the Third Circuit ruling granting summary judgment to Thomson Reuters, in a case alleging tech startup ROSS Intelligence infringed copyrighted material from Thomson Reuters’ Westlaw platform to create a competing legal research tool. Ms. Charlesworth stated the ruling is significant because many AI companies are asserting transformative use, in interpreting The Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith case. (Behind paywall) View Article
February 13 2025
Thomson Reuters Prevails in Copyright Battle with AI Company
MediaDailyNews quotes Jeremy S. Goldman on the federal court decision that Ross Intelligence infringed Thomson Reuters’ copyright by training its services using Westlaw summaries, known as “headnotes.” Mr. Goldman states the ruling could impact lawsuits by other copyright owners over the use of their material to develop AI. However, he distinguishes some of the high-profile cases such as those against OpenAI in training ChatGPT. He notes OpenAI argues it did not copy material to compete with authors and publishers but to create its language model and technology. View Article
February 12 2025
What a Character
Boston College Law School Magazine quotes Jeffrey A. Greenberg in a profile of Michael Schiffer, founder of S2 Advertising Law, and the former legal director at Twitter. The article titled "What a Character" notes that Mr. Greenberg was on the hiring committee that recruited Mr. Schiffer to join Frankfurt Kurnit’s Advertising group, where he worked for more than 10 years. View Article
February 11 2025