Sign Up for Alerts
Sign up to receive receive industry-specific emails from our legal team.
Sign Up for Alerts
We provide tailored, industry-specific legal updates to our clients and other friends of the firm.
Areas of Interest
February 10th, 2023
Now That Birkin NFTs Are Illegal, What Happens to the Ones Collectors Bought?
Blockchain Technology Co-Chair Jeremy S. Goldman is quoted in the article, “Now That Birkin NFTs Are Illegal, What Happens to the Ones Collectors Bought?” published by Observer. The article discusses the landmark case between Hermès and MetaBirkin creator, Mason Rothschild and the challenges associated with destroying the NFT collection. Jeremy is quoted saying, “Taking the MetaBirkins off the market will be nearly impossible. It’s a real unanswered question with blockchain: what happens in the event of infringement?”
Jeremy notes that in typical infringement cases regarding physical goods, a positive ruling would allow a company to impound and destroy the assets. He says, “It’s very difficult to get rid of the tokens or de-link the artwork.” While Hermès can prevent major NFT marketplaces from selling the MetaBirkins, there is not much they can do to prevent the collection’s sale outside of that. Jeremy adds, “It’s not so different than what happens in the real world If a manufacturer creates counterfeit goods, there’s not much control once they’ve left. It’s very hard to put that genie back in the bottle.”
Jeremy also notes that the value of MetaBirkins may see a bump in demand because of their new status as contraband. He identifies customer recourse as another issue made complicated by the digital nature of the case. He says, “Owners of physical assets typically have recourse against those who sell them counterfeit goods, such as fake luxury bags. It’s still unclear whether MetaBirkin holders can extract compensation from Rothschild.”
Read the full article here.
Other Quoted
Challenges in Opt-Out Design and Children’s Privacy Highlighted by Sling TV’s Settlement With California AG
Cybersecurity Law Report quoted Daniel Goldberg regarding California AG Rob Bonta's $530,000 settlement with Sling TV for CCPA violations related to opt-out processes and children's privacy protections. Goldberg noted this is "the first CCPA settlement involving a connected TV" and indicates that connected TV is now a priority for privacy enforcement. Goldberg predicted future settlements are more likely to reach seven or eight figures as investigations progress. He explained that companies struggle to operationalize opt-outs across different platforms because many rely heavily on consent management platform vendors that often cover only cookie-based activity and don't connect to the backend systems that actually drive targeted advertising.
On children's privacy, Goldberg highlighted the CA AG's aggressive stance, noting that although Sling TV didn't collect age data, the AG concluded they still had knowledge of minors through child-directed channels, notifications from programmers, demographic inferences purchased from data brokers, and ad-targeting segments that included children. He observed this "arguably expands the notion of 'actual knowledge' under the CCPA." Goldberg advises companies to map out data flows and opt-out signals across every environment and audit vendor configurations to ensure the tools actually work. Read the full article on children’s privacy protections here. (Behind a paywall)
December 1 2025
Game Companies Must be Flexible to Comply with Changing Laws
Emma Smizer was recently featured as a panelist at GamesBeat Next 2025 and quoted in a GamesBeat article discussing global regulatory compliance and its impact on the gaming industry. The panel examined how evolving policy frameworks create new opportunities for developers and platforms navigating global markets.
Smizer addressed compliance challenges under emerging laws, specifically citing the Texas App Store Accountability Act. She noted that this kind of legislation changes how developers and platforms interact with users: “App stores have to do this age verification, but so do software and hardware developers. Global compliance is complicated, even just across the states… We’re moving toward a world where you can’t just be willfully ignorant about the age of your users.”
Her analysis emphasizes a growing trend that age verification and child safety requirements are not only regulatory hurdles but also can create opportunities and growth for businesses and sectors. Read the full summary of the panel here.
November 25 2025
Copyright Guide or Policy Change? Project Divides IP Attys
Law360 quoted Jacqueline Charlesworth on the controversy surrounding the American Law Institute’s copyright restatement project. Ms. Charlesworth criticized the initiative as advancing a “revisionist theory” that could weaken copyright protections. She was among nearly two dozen advisers who resigned from the project, signaling deep concerns about its direction.
The article highlights a broader debate within the IP community: whether the restatement simply clarifies existing law or attempts to reshape policy in favor of users. Ms. Charlesworth’s perspective emphasizes the stakes for rights holders as courts and practitioners consider how much influence the restatement may carry. Read the Law360 article about the copyright restatement project here.
November 19 2025
