- Published Articles
- In the Press
- Press Releases
Sign Up for Alerts
Sign up to receive receive industry-specific emails from our legal team.
Sign Up for Alerts
We provide tailored, industry-specific legal updates to our clients and other friends of the firm.
Areas of Interest
July 29th, 2013
Can Lawyers Advise Clients to Delete Social Media Content?
Increasingly, lawyers are faced with questions about whether - and to what extent - they should advise clients about the use of social media. While news reports and ethics opinions have focused primarily on lawyers' social media use, the issue of client counseling has received less attention. Now, a new ethics Opinion by the New York County Lawyers Association concludes that lawyers may ethically counsel clients about their use of social media, including, in some circumstances, advising them to "take down" social media content. It is an important opinion for New York practitioners. Here is a brief summary.
First, the Opinion states that a lawyer may advise her client about what the client should and should not post on social media - as long as the lawyer does not participate in the creation of false evidence. The Opinion permits lawyers to counsel clients to publish truthful information on social media that is favorable to the clients' legal position.
Second, the New York Rules of Professional Conduct do not bar a lawyer from advising her client to take down social media content, as long as the lawyer and client are not bound by a duty to preserve the material under substantive law. For example, if a lawsuit is anticipated or underway, there is a duty to preserve relevant evidence, including evidence located on social media.
Third, a lawyer may counsel her client about the legal implications of the client's social media content, including how it might be used for or against the client in a civil case.
While most of the Opinion is couched in terms of what a lawyer may do, the Opinion also notes that lawyers "could, in some circumstances" have "an obligation to advise clients" concerning their use of social media (emphasis added). The Opinion leaves open, however, what circumstances would trigger such a duty. One example, alluded to above, is the duty to instruct clients to preserve relevant social media content in a lawsuit. Recent cases have demonstrated that failure to do so could result in sanctions and/or disciplinary charges. In Lester v. Allied Concrete Co., for example, a Virginia attorney who counseled his personal injury client to "clean up" his Facebook page by deleting several compromising photos was required to pay $542,000 in sanctions and now faces a disciplinary hearing. Likewise, in Gatto v. United Airlines, a New Jersey federal court sanctioned a party with a negative inference for deactivating his Facebook account and erasing relevant data. Indeed, the mere act of deleting social media content, even innocuous or irrelevant content, may appear suspicious to courts and other judicial bodies.
In sum, if a lawyer advises a client to remove one or more social media postings, the lawyer should create a clear record indicating the reason for the decision, what was removed, and when. Copies of deleted content should be preserved in case a dispute arises later.
If you have any questions about this ethics Opinion, or about other legal ethics and professional responsibility issues, please contact Nicole Hyland at (212) 826 5552 or email@example.com, Ronald Minkoff at (212) 705 4837 or firstname.lastname@example.org, Richard Maltz at (212) 705 4804 or email@example.com, or any other member of the Frankfurt Kurnit Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Group.
Other Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Alerts
ABA Opinion Limits Restrictions on Departing Partners
There’s important news for law firm leaders who have recently revised partnership and shareholder agreements to restrict partner departures. In ABA Formal Opinion 489, the ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility spells out new limits on notice periods, on rules governing communications with clients, and on so-called “ownership” of clients. Here’s what firm managers need to know to stay on the right side of the ethics rules. Read more.
February 6 2020
Frankfurt Kurnit’s Second Annual Litigation Ethics Summit - FKKS Ethics Game Show
To cap off the Second Annual Litigation Ethics Summit our panel challenged some brave audience members to participate in a contest of ethical wits. Read more.
October 30 2019
Frankfurt Kurnit’s Second Annual Litigation Ethics Summit - Aggressive Bargaining: The Legal and Ethical Boundaries of “Me Too”-era Settlements
On Thursday, October 24th Frankfurt Kurnit hosted its Second Annual Litigation Ethics Summit. The second panel of the day focused on the ethical and legal limits of aggressive bargaining in the settlement context, with a special focus on settlements of harassment and discrimination cases in the "Me Too"-era. Read more.
October 30 2019