Sign Up for Alerts
Sign up to receive receive industry-specific emails from our legal team.
Sign Up for Alerts
We provide tailored, industry-specific legal updates to our clients and other friends of the firm.
Areas of Interest
October 21st, 2022
State Regulators Charge NFT Casino Project With Securities Violations
Blockchain Technology Co-Chair Jeremy S. Goldman is quoted in the article, “State Regulators Charge NFT Casino Project With Securities Violations” published by Decrypt. The article discusses the emergency cease-and-desist orders filed against Slotie by state securities regulators from Texas, New Jersey, Kentucky, and Alabama. Jeremy believes it makes perfect sense that an NFT project like Slotie would be one of the first to incur a securities regulator’s wrath. He is quoted saying, “This is low-hanging fruit. [Slotie NFTs] are marketed as giving the holders a passive income in revenue that's generated through the efforts of Slotties and its partners, which is the definition of a security.” One reason these states may have chosen to pursue Slotie for securities violations, Jeremy says, is the fact that the case pertains to gambling, a highly regulated and closely monitored sector of state law enforcement. He says, “I imagine that part of the reason it came from the states is because they started with concern over gambling. And then, I guess, as a matter of litigation strategy and enforcement, they thought that the securities angle was an easier shot.”
Jeremy sees the biggest development from this week’s enforcement action against Slotie to be the indication that there could be even more dogs in that fight than previously anticipated. He says, “The federal agencies are not the only sheriffs in town. I can only speculate, but it does feel to me that there's some jockeying for power and control. And this is a signal that the states still have a role to play when it comes to even securities in the crypto space.”
Read the full article here.
Other Quoted
California Disney Fine Pushes Companies to Fully Honor Opt-Outs
Bloomberg Law quoted Daniel M. Goldberg in their recent article about how California fined Disney $2.75 million for allegedly failing to fully honor consumers’ opt-out requests under the California Consumer Privacy Act, signaling increased scrutiny of how companies implement privacy rights across devices, services, and systems. The enforcement action underscores regulators’ growing expectation that opt-out mechanisms must work seamlessly and consistently, with technical compliance now under closer investigation. Read more.
February 25 2026
California’s attorney general issues largest CCPA fine to date
IAPP quotes Daniel Goldberg on evolving privacy enforcement trends, emphasizing the significant cost and complexity of responding to high-profile investigations and the challenges companies face in aligning technology with regulatory expectations under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Read Read more.
February 13 2026
Automated Content Recognition Technology Takes Privacy Enforcement Spotlight
The IAPP quotes Andrew Folks in its coverage of Texas’ lawsuits over automated content recognition technology. Read more.
January 26 2026
